Amid this and other public fears, a survey conducted by Angus Reid in August 2018 found that two-thirds of Canadians believed that the arrival of people seeking asylum in Canada was a “crisis.” Storm Alliance and La Meute, two far-right nationalist groups in Quebec, argued that the situation constituted an “invasion” of Quebec City by “illegals” and regularly held demonstrations on Roxham Road, which held the patriotic sovereign flag. Justice Ann Marie McDonald said the agreement that prevents people from entering either Canada or the United States in the official Canada-U.S. Crossing borders and asylum claims – in violation of the Charter section that guarantees “the right to life, liberty and security of the person,” the GST was introduced in 1990 to provide temporary refuge in the United States to people from countries affected by conflicts or natural disasters that prevent them from returning home. The removal of Trump`s designation has had the unexpected result that the number of people crossing the northern U.S. border into Canada, often from official border crossings, has increased dramatically to seek refuge. For all other countries that could be designated as safe third countries in the future, the agreement helps both governments better manage access to the refugee system in each country for people crossing the land border between Canada and the United States. The two countries signed the agreement on 5 December 2002 and came into force on 29 December 2004. The agreement has been under intense scrutiny by U.S. President Donald Trump`s administration since the start of tightening asylum rules.
The Safe Third Country Agreement between Canada and the United States, signed in 2002 and in effect since 2004, provides that applicants arriving at official land ports can apply for protection in the first-arrival country unless they are entitled to a waiver from the agreement. On January 30, 2017, critic Jenny Kwan of the New Democratic Party (PND) of IMMIGRATION, refugees and citizens of Canada (IRCC) proposed an emergency debate on “President Trump`s immigration and travel ban from seven countries in the Middle East and North Africa.”  During the debate, the NDP called on the government to immediately suspend the agreement on the security of third-country nationals, citing the fact that “Canada can no longer trust that the U.S. refugee system provides refuge for those at risk of persecution.”  The official Conservative Party of Canada has stated that it will not oppose the suspension of the agreement, while the Green Party of Canada has expressed support for the suspension of the agreement.  4 Exceptions for the processing of claims in the third country: this image has been tarnished by the virulent reaction of the media and political actors to the thousands of people who, in recent years, have often come on foot to file a claim for asylum in Canada-United States. Especially on roxham Road in Quebec City, near the New York State border. This is partly the result of the Trump administration`s new anti-migration policy since 2016 and the long-term effects of the Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA), signed by Canada and the United States after the September 11, 2001 attacks. Conventions on safe third-country nationals are not explicitly mentioned in the 1951 Refugee Convention or the 1967 Protocol on the Status of Refugees. Rather, their legitimacy derives from Article 31 of the 1951 Convention, which states that a refugee should not be punished for illegal entry into a country if he arrives directly from a country where he is threatened. The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has itself warned against over-interpreting safe third country agreements, although it acknowledges that they may be acceptable in certain circumstances.
 Such ambiguities have prompted some Canadian legal experts to question the legality of the Canada-U.S. safe third country agreement.  The agreement was signed on December 5, 2002 in Washington, D.C.